Digital screens like computers, smartphones, tablets, and wearable devices enhance communication and productivity but also present a new challenge for eye care professionals (ECPs): addressing the visual demands of patients who spend hours focused on screens.
Screens expose users to extended near and intermediate-range visual tasks. As a result, many people experience various vision-related issues called computer vision syndrome (CVS), also known as digital eye strain (DES). Research shows that 50% or more of digital device users experience symptoms of DES (Moore et al., 2021).
Understanding the complexities of this condition and selecting appropriate lens solutions requires a nuanced approach that considers both the physiological mechanisms of eye strain and the latest technological advances in lens design.
Computer vision syndrome (CVS), or digital eye strain, refers to a range of eye and vision-related issues that stem from prolonged digital device usage. Unlike reading printed text, viewing digital screens requires the eyes to constantly adjust to pixelated images, screen glare, and blue light emissions. This continuous adjustment overworks the ciliary muscles that help the eyes focus.
Beyond muscle strain, prolonged screen use can also affect the eyes' tear film, leading to dryness and discomfort similar to dry eye disease. Additionally, staring at screens for long periods can temporarily affect focus, causing short-term nearsightedness.
Over time, excessive strain can lead to eye fatigue, difficulty focusing, and visual discomfort. If left unaddressed, CVS can contribute to long-term vision issues, making regular eye care and proper screen habits essential for maintaining eye health.
Several factors contribute to computer vision syndrome:
Symptoms of CVS can vary, but they typically include:
The first step in treating computer vision syndrome is a comprehensive eye examination to diagnose specific vision issues. An eye care professional may assess accommodative facility (the eye’s ability to shift focus), vergence ranges (eye coordination at different distances), and the patient's digital device usage habits, including screen time and working distances.
Using validated symptom screening tools such as the Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS-Q) helps evaluate DES symptoms effectively. ECPs can correct CVS by making environmental adjustment recommendations and customizing the patient’s eyewear to reduce strain.
The right choice for a computer vision syndrome lens depends on a patient’s prescription, work habits, and comfort requirements.
Single-vision computer lenses optimize one visual distance, most often the intermediate range, which is also the average computer screen distance. They are an effective option for individuals who do not need multifocal correction or who have separate reading and distance prescriptions.
Features
Anti-fatigue lenses reduce eye strain for younger wearers and early presbyopes using computers, with a concentrated power boost in the lower lens area. They are great for eliminating visual fatigue at an intermediate distance, while the bottom power add would assist a patient when they have to look away from the computer to focus on close-up tasks.
Features
Computer progressive lenses, also called occupational progressives, provide multiple corrections in one lens, emphasizing near and intermediate ranges (as opposed to the more common design that emphasizes the distance range at the top of the lens). These multifocal options provide balanced correction for professionals who alternate between computer work and activities at other distances, such as reading or looking around a meeting room.
Features:
Regardless of the lens design, specialized coatings and treatments can enhance comfort for individuals with CVS. Most coatings and treatments function with any lens designed for digital screen viewing, furthering the relief proper eye correction provides.
Features:
The benefits of these computer-specific lenses are customized power distribution for specific working distances, reduced peripheral distortion compared to traditional progressives, and extended intermediate zones optimized for monitoring viewing distances. Choosing the correct lens for each patient can help alleviate CVS symptoms by:
Prescribing eyewear for extended digital device use requires a methodical, patient-centered approach. Below are tips outlining practical guidelines and key considerations to ensure visual outcomes.
The success of any lens design hinges on accurate measurements. Hence, carefully measure:
Patients often switch between digital screens, smartphones, printed documents, and in-person interactions. Taking a complete lifestyle inventory enables ECPs to recommend the most fitting lens design and coatings.
A perfect prescription and lens design can fall short if patients use them incorrectly. Clear instructions on how and when to wear computer-specific glasses and reminders about lifestyle and behavior recommendations can enhance patient satisfaction and improve clinical outcomes.
Computer vision syndrome is a modern challenge that reflects our pervasive digital lifestyles. Thankfully, technology has risen to meet the visual obstacles that come with the territory. From occupational lenses to freeform single vision, there is a broad spectrum of tools to help patients cope with CVS.
IOT employs next-generation freeform design and precise optical modeling to address the specific challenges posed by computer vision syndrome. By customizing each lens to match a wearer’s unique workspace setup, viewing distances, and visual habits, IOT solutions deliver enhanced clarity and reduce the strain typically associated with prolonged screen usage.
Backed by a commitment to ongoing research and development, IOT equips eye care professionals and labs with lens designs to provide patient-focused solutions—ensuring comfortable, efficient visual performance in today’s screen-driven world.
Contact us to learn more about our occupational and digital device lenses and how they can enhance your portfolio.
Moore, P. A., Wolffsohn, J. S., & Sheppard, A. L. (2021). Attitudes of optometrists in the UK and Ireland to Digital Eye Strain and approaches to assessment and management. Ophthalmic and Physiologic Optics, 41(6), 1165–1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12887
Sheppard, A. L., & Wolffsohn, J. S. (2018). Digital eye strain: prevalence, measurement, and amelioration. BMJ Open Ophthalmology, 3(1), e000146. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000146
You may also like: